<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 784 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the refund claim of the assessee, a sugar manufacturer, amounting to Rs. 5,27,736. The claim was based on the excess duty paid by the assessee compared to the duty paid by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for sugar supplied. The Tribunal found that the burden of the excess duty was borne by the assessee and not passed on to buyers. Supporting evidence from the FCI and the absence of contrary evidence led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the refund for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 784 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the refund claim of the assessee, a sugar manufacturer, amounting to Rs. 5,27,736. The claim was based on the excess duty paid by the assessee compared to the duty paid by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for sugar supplied. The Tribunal found that the burden of the excess duty was borne by the assessee and not passed on to buyers. Supporting evidence from the FCI and the absence of contrary evidence led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the refund for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>