https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126473 Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 was treated as a complete code on appeals in arbitration matters, and the expression "second appeal" in Section 39(2) was construed to bar any further appeal from an order made in appeal under Section 39(1). That statutory restriction was held to override the Letters Patent right of intra-court appeal, because the Act deliberately limited appeals to specified orders and did not preserve other appellate remedies. Accordingly, an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent was not maintainable against the appellate order of a Single Judge under Section 39(1). en-us Tue, 05 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:15:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126473 Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 was treated as a complete code on appeals in arbitration matters, and the expression "second appeal" in Section 39(2) was construed to bar any further appeal from an order made in appeal under Section 39(1). That statutory restriction was held to override the Letters Patent right of intra-court appeal, because the Act deliberately limited appeals to specified orders and did not preserve other appellate remedies. Accordingly, an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent was not maintainable against the appellate order of a Single Judge under Section 39(1). Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126473