https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126458 Where an alleged duty default occurred before the amended Rule 8 forfeiture consequence came into force, the interim pre-deposit requirement was not insisted upon. The record showed that duty and interest had been paid, and the appellants established a strong prima facie case against the demand. On that basis, recovery of the disputed amount was stayed at the interim stage and the appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126458 Where an alleged duty default occurred before the amended Rule 8 forfeiture consequence came into force, the interim pre-deposit requirement was not insisted upon. The record showed that duty and interest had been paid, and the appellants established a strong prima facie case against the demand. On that basis, recovery of the disputed amount was stayed at the interim stage and the appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126458