<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 767 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126455</link>
    <description>After the amendment to Section 35A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner (Appeals) no longer has power to remand matters to the adjudicating authority, so a remand order made after that amendment is without jurisdiction and cannot stand. Where the refund claim has not been properly examined on issues such as unjust enrichment and whether duty incidence was passed on, the matter may still require fresh adjudication by the original authority. The claim must then be reconsidered afresh with opportunity of hearing and in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 767 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126455</link>
      <description>After the amendment to Section 35A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner (Appeals) no longer has power to remand matters to the adjudicating authority, so a remand order made after that amendment is without jurisdiction and cannot stand. Where the refund claim has not been properly examined on issues such as unjust enrichment and whether duty incidence was passed on, the matter may still require fresh adjudication by the original authority. The claim must then be reconsidered afresh with opportunity of hearing and in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>