<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 765 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest due to the absence of proper duty paying documents supporting the Additional Excise Duty (GSI) credit. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as there was no intent to evade duty payment. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with Rule 9 for availing credits based on valid duty paying documents and highlighted the significance of accurate documentation in claiming Cenvat Credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 765 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest due to the absence of proper duty paying documents supporting the Additional Excise Duty (GSI) credit. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as there was no intent to evade duty payment. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with Rule 9 for availing credits based on valid duty paying documents and highlighted the significance of accurate documentation in claiming Cenvat Credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>