<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126451</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand against the appellant for clearing grey fabrics without payment, rejected the limitation argument, highlighted discrepancies in possession of factory premises and manufacturing operations, dismissed the claim of financial difficulty, and imposed a pre-deposit requirement for granting the stay against the remaining duty, interest, and penalty amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:01:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126451</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand against the appellant for clearing grey fabrics without payment, rejected the limitation argument, highlighted discrepancies in possession of factory premises and manufacturing operations, dismissed the claim of financial difficulty, and imposed a pre-deposit requirement for granting the stay against the remaining duty, interest, and penalty amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>