<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 761 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126449</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the condonation of delay application due to the short 9-day delay in filing the appeal. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reassessment of physician&#039;s samples based on the law declared by the Larger Bench, providing the appellant an opportunity to present their case. The penalty issue was left open for arguments before the original adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 761 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126449</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the condonation of delay application due to the short 9-day delay in filing the appeal. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reassessment of physician&#039;s samples based on the law declared by the Larger Bench, providing the appellant an opportunity to present their case. The penalty issue was left open for arguments before the original adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>