<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 531 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the precedent established in Commr. v. Indchem Electronics. The judge emphasized the importance of finished goods not being produced due to the destruction of inputs during the job work procedure, ultimately granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 531 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the precedent established in Commr. v. Indchem Electronics. The judge emphasized the importance of finished goods not being produced due to the destruction of inputs during the job work procedure, ultimately granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>