<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 757 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a composite textile mill, in a dispute over the denial of concessional duty rates on processed fabrics under Notification No. 14/2002. The Tribunal noted that the overlooked explanation in the Notification deemed all market-bought fabrics as duty paid, supporting the appellants&#039; argument. Considering the appellants&#039; weak financial position and the potential significant impact on duty calculation, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, unconditionally allowing the stay petition during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:45:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 757 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a composite textile mill, in a dispute over the denial of concessional duty rates on processed fabrics under Notification No. 14/2002. The Tribunal noted that the overlooked explanation in the Notification deemed all market-bought fabrics as duty paid, supporting the appellants&#039; argument. Considering the appellants&#039; weak financial position and the potential significant impact on duty calculation, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, unconditionally allowing the stay petition during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>