<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126441</link>
    <description>Differential customs duty could not be sustained where the importer disputed the departmental test report and was denied retest because no duplicate sample had been retained. Reliance on that report without an effective opportunity to challenge the test result breached natural justice and fair hearing requirements, so the impugned order was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126441</link>
      <description>Differential customs duty could not be sustained where the importer disputed the departmental test report and was denied retest because no duplicate sample had been retained. Reliance on that report without an effective opportunity to challenge the test result breached natural justice and fair hearing requirements, so the impugned order was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>