<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 752 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 7 lakhs to Rs. 4.00 lakhs, considering the mitigating factor of the already inflicted confiscation of goods containing prohibited items. The appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was disposed of, maintaining the fine at Rs. 50,000 and upholding the decision on confiscation while modifying the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 752 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 7 lakhs to Rs. 4.00 lakhs, considering the mitigating factor of the already inflicted confiscation of goods containing prohibited items. The appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was disposed of, maintaining the fine at Rs. 50,000 and upholding the decision on confiscation while modifying the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>