<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the circumstances and intentions behind the delay in filing appeals. The decision highlighted the significance of condoning delays where there is no negligence or inaction on the part of the appellants, ensuring a just and fair resolution of the legal matter at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:12:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the circumstances and intentions behind the delay in filing appeals. The decision highlighted the significance of condoning delays where there is no negligence or inaction on the part of the appellants, ensuring a just and fair resolution of the legal matter at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>