<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 744 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to condone the delay of 821 days in filing the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise. Despite various circumstances cited by the appellant, including technical and financial difficulties, closure of operations, and health issues, the Tribunal found the reasons insufficient. Citing a previous judgment involving the same appellant, the Tribunal emphasized that the reasons for the delay post-April 2007 were not satisfactorily explained. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and the appeal as barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 744 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to condone the delay of 821 days in filing the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise. Despite various circumstances cited by the appellant, including technical and financial difficulties, closure of operations, and health issues, the Tribunal found the reasons insufficient. Citing a previous judgment involving the same appellant, the Tribunal emphasized that the reasons for the delay post-April 2007 were not satisfactorily explained. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and the appeal as barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>