https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126389 The CESTAT rejected M/s. ITI Ltd.'s request for rectification of a Final Order due to a delay in filing an appeal. Despite the appellant's argument of an incorrect communication address causing the delay, the CESTAT emphasized the proximity of the Corporate Office and the Plant, stating that the communication received at the Corporate Office did not warrant rectification. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate communication addresses and timely appeals, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility for diligence in pursuing appeals within stipulated timelines. The judgment underscores the significance of procedural diligence and communication accuracy in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:20:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126389 The CESTAT rejected M/s. ITI Ltd.'s request for rectification of a Final Order due to a delay in filing an appeal. Despite the appellant's argument of an incorrect communication address causing the delay, the CESTAT emphasized the proximity of the Corporate Office and the Plant, stating that the communication received at the Corporate Office did not warrant rectification. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate communication addresses and timely appeals, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility for diligence in pursuing appeals within stipulated timelines. The judgment underscores the significance of procedural diligence and communication accuracy in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126389