https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126383 The court rejected the application for delay condonation in filing the appeal due to a 71-day delay attributed to an employee misplacing the order. The judge found the applicant's inaction and lack of corrective measures regarding the misplaced order indicated a lack of diligence. Citing precedents where delay condonation was granted for specific circumstances involving employee actions, the judge emphasized the importance of promptly addressing delays in filing appeals. Consequently, the appeal and stay application were dismissed, underscoring the necessity for applicants to take proactive measures to ensure timely filing of appeals. en-us Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:42:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126383 The court rejected the application for delay condonation in filing the appeal due to a 71-day delay attributed to an employee misplacing the order. The judge found the applicant's inaction and lack of corrective measures regarding the misplaced order indicated a lack of diligence. Citing precedents where delay condonation was granted for specific circumstances involving employee actions, the judge emphasized the importance of promptly addressing delays in filing appeals. Consequently, the appeal and stay application were dismissed, underscoring the necessity for applicants to take proactive measures to ensure timely filing of appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126383