<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 713 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126375</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled that separate appeals must be filed for each order-in-original, even if disposed of in a single order by the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment emphasized the interpretation of the explanation clause to Rule 6A of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. In the case, the order dated 23-4-09 in Stay Application No. 230/2009 was recalled to exclude paragraph 3.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 713 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126375</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled that separate appeals must be filed for each order-in-original, even if disposed of in a single order by the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment emphasized the interpretation of the explanation clause to Rule 6A of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. In the case, the order dated 23-4-09 in Stay Application No. 230/2009 was recalled to exclude paragraph 3.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>