https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126367 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that as the penalty was not specified in the challenged order, there is no significant liability under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The show cause notice issued under Rule 11 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 is discharged, allowing the department to pursue additional actions in the case. en-us Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:21:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126367 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that as the penalty was not specified in the challenged order, there is no significant liability under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The show cause notice issued under Rule 11 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 is discharged, allowing the department to pursue additional actions in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126367