<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 740 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126354</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on a merely technical objection where the inputs were received under proper duty-paying documents, entered in statutory records, and used in manufacture of final products. Rule 57G(11) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, as amended, protected credit despite an imperfect declaration if those substantive conditions were met. The declaration here broadly described iron and steel scrap, and the records showed the goods received were iron and steel scrap from old ships. Credit was therefore admissible, and denial was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 740 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126354</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on a merely technical objection where the inputs were received under proper duty-paying documents, entered in statutory records, and used in manufacture of final products. Rule 57G(11) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, as amended, protected credit despite an imperfect declaration if those substantive conditions were met. The declaration here broadly described iron and steel scrap, and the records showed the goods received were iron and steel scrap from old ships. Credit was therefore admissible, and denial was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>