<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 728 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126342</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI reduced the penalty imposed on a paper manufacturer for delayed excise duty payment from Rs. 3.5 lakhs to Rs. 35,000. The appellant faced financial difficulties causing the delays, argued no intention to evade duty, and cited a similar case precedent. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional evasion, deemed the original penalty inappropriate, and imposed a reduced penalty under a different rule. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:55:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 728 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126342</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI reduced the penalty imposed on a paper manufacturer for delayed excise duty payment from Rs. 3.5 lakhs to Rs. 35,000. The appellant faced financial difficulties causing the delays, argued no intention to evade duty, and cited a similar case precedent. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional evasion, deemed the original penalty inappropriate, and imposed a reduced penalty under a different rule. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>