<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 712 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126326</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) overstepped jurisdiction by reassessing a finalized refund order, leading to the reversal of interest on delayed payment of the refund. The Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider only the specific grounds raised by the Revenue in their appeal, emphasizing the need to refrain from reassessing the sustainability of the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:02:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 712 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126326</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) overstepped jurisdiction by reassessing a finalized refund order, leading to the reversal of interest on delayed payment of the refund. The Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider only the specific grounds raised by the Revenue in their appeal, emphasizing the need to refrain from reassessing the sustainability of the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>