<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 706 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for shortages found during stock verification, dismissed the limitation defense, and rejected penalties under Section 11AC due to lack of evidence of clandestine clearance, affirming lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:36:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 706 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for shortages found during stock verification, dismissed the limitation defense, and rejected penalties under Section 11AC due to lack of evidence of clandestine clearance, affirming lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>