<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 692 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126306</link>
    <description>The appellate judge set aside the enhancement of the redemption fine, citing a breach of natural justice due to lack of notice to the affected party. The discrepancy in duty demand for finished goods was noted, leading to a remand for reconciliation. The plea of an accounting mistake for finished goods was deemed unsubstantiated, with goods found to be clandestinely removed. The matter of penalties under the law was remanded for consideration, emphasizing a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal concluded with directions to address penalty issues fairly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 692 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126306</link>
      <description>The appellate judge set aside the enhancement of the redemption fine, citing a breach of natural justice due to lack of notice to the affected party. The discrepancy in duty demand for finished goods was noted, leading to a remand for reconciliation. The plea of an accounting mistake for finished goods was deemed unsubstantiated, with goods found to be clandestinely removed. The matter of penalties under the law was remanded for consideration, emphasizing a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal concluded with directions to address penalty issues fairly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>