https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126304 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, upheld the rejection of refund claims by importers of secondhand photocopiers due to delays in filing timely appeals. The original confiscation of goods and imposed fines and penalties were vacated by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal ruled against refund claims citing the importance of adhering to appeal timelines. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126304 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, upheld the rejection of refund claims by importers of secondhand photocopiers due to delays in filing timely appeals. The original confiscation of goods and imposed fines and penalties were vacated by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal ruled against refund claims citing the importance of adhering to appeal timelines. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126304