<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 686 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126300</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on common inputs used in manufacturing dutiable final products could be utilised for duty payment without one-to-one correlation between each input and a specific final product. The record showed that the assessee used the common inputs in a merged manufacturing set-up producing both dutiable and exempted goods, but the credit scheme did not require segregation of every input against a particular output. Credit could not be denied merely because exempted clearances also existed, so the Revenue&#039;s objection to utilisation of the credit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 686 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126300</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on common inputs used in manufacturing dutiable final products could be utilised for duty payment without one-to-one correlation between each input and a specific final product. The record showed that the assessee used the common inputs in a merged manufacturing set-up producing both dutiable and exempted goods, but the credit scheme did not require segregation of every input against a particular output. Credit could not be denied merely because exempted clearances also existed, so the Revenue&#039;s objection to utilisation of the credit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>