https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126298 Entitlement to abatement of distributors' discount in provisional assessment of lubricants depended on the discount being communicated to buyers at the time of removal of the goods. The evidence produced was found insufficient to show that the discount had been made known in the manner required to qualify for deduction. The claim for abatement was therefore rejected by CESTAT. en-us Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:18:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126298 Entitlement to abatement of distributors' discount in provisional assessment of lubricants depended on the discount being communicated to buyers at the time of removal of the goods. The evidence produced was found insufficient to show that the discount had been made known in the manner required to qualify for deduction. The claim for abatement was therefore rejected by CESTAT. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126298