<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 833 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appropriation of the interest amount by the Adjudicating Authority was improper as the interest was not determined as required under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The demand for interest required a show cause notice and an appealable order, which were not issued. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 833 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appropriation of the interest amount by the Adjudicating Authority was improper as the interest was not determined as required under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The demand for interest required a show cause notice and an appealable order, which were not issued. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>