<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 825 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the destruction of imported goods without duty payment. Despite the department&#039;s claim of insufficient details for destruction, the Tribunal determined that the appellant diligently informed the authorities and sought permission for destruction. As no response was received, the destruction within the EOU was deemed justified. The demand for duty and penalty was considered unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 825 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the destruction of imported goods without duty payment. Despite the department&#039;s claim of insufficient details for destruction, the Tribunal determined that the appellant diligently informed the authorities and sought permission for destruction. As no response was received, the destruction within the EOU was deemed justified. The demand for duty and penalty was considered unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>