https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126267 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, ruling that they correctly paid duty on exempted bulk drugs as per Notification No. 6/2003. The Tribunal rejected the JCDR's argument that bulk drugs were intermediate products and emphasized that payment was not required if the bulk drugs were exempted. Citing the Texmo Industries case, the Tribunal found the appellants' actions compliant with the law and deemed the JCDR's interpretation unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:49:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126267 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, ruling that they correctly paid duty on exempted bulk drugs as per Notification No. 6/2003. The Tribunal rejected the JCDR's argument that bulk drugs were intermediate products and emphasized that payment was not required if the bulk drugs were exempted. Citing the Texmo Industries case, the Tribunal found the appellants' actions compliant with the law and deemed the JCDR's interpretation unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126267