<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 813 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126261</link>
    <description>Education Cess on import of palm oil was considered in a stay application where the Tribunal gave weight to Board Circular No. 26/2007-Cus. dated 20.07.2007 and the stated revenue impact. The earlier tribunal decision relied on by the assessee was treated as not having considered that circular. On that basis, the operation of the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) was stayed pending further hearing, and the matter was listed for merits consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 813 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126261</link>
      <description>Education Cess on import of palm oil was considered in a stay application where the Tribunal gave weight to Board Circular No. 26/2007-Cus. dated 20.07.2007 and the stated revenue impact. The earlier tribunal decision relied on by the assessee was treated as not having considered that circular. On that basis, the operation of the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) was stayed pending further hearing, and the matter was listed for merits consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>