https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126254 Entitlement to exemption and clearance benefits was examined in the context of a demand for differential duty, interest and penalties, with the appellant relying on permission from the Development Commissioner and the applicable export policy. CESTAT considered that the effect of the permission granted under paragraph 9.9(e) and the manner of clearances raised a legal question requiring deeper examination, and found no prima facie reason to deny the claimed benefit at the interim stage. On that basis, the Tribunal held that a prima facie case had been made out for dispensation of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:12:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126254 Entitlement to exemption and clearance benefits was examined in the context of a demand for differential duty, interest and penalties, with the appellant relying on permission from the Development Commissioner and the applicable export policy. CESTAT considered that the effect of the permission granted under paragraph 9.9(e) and the manner of clearances raised a legal question requiring deeper examination, and found no prima facie reason to deny the claimed benefit at the interim stage. On that basis, the Tribunal held that a prima facie case had been made out for dispensation of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126254