<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 849 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126237</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the refund of Central Excise duty paid on returned goods. The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, confirming the respondent&#039;s compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the sanctioning of the refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal found no errors in the actions of the respondent and affirmed the refund granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:13:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 849 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126237</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the refund of Central Excise duty paid on returned goods. The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, confirming the respondent&#039;s compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the sanctioning of the refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal found no errors in the actions of the respondent and affirmed the refund granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>