<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 562 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Small Scale Industry (SSI) notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the unjust enrichment in the refund claim, emphasizing that the duty burden was not passed on to customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the evidence supported the finding that duty incidence was not transferred to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 562 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Small Scale Industry (SSI) notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the unjust enrichment in the refund claim, emphasizing that the duty burden was not passed on to customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the evidence supported the finding that duty incidence was not transferred to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>