<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 813 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126229</link>
    <description>The court upheld the policy of forfeiture for non-fulfillment of export obligations, emphasizing the government&#039;s right to design such policies to maximize foreign exchange. However, the court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s force majeure claim related to reclassification by German Customs, remitting the case for reconsideration by the First Appellate Committee to provide a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present evidence supporting their claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 813 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126229</link>
      <description>The court upheld the policy of forfeiture for non-fulfillment of export obligations, emphasizing the government&#039;s right to design such policies to maximize foreign exchange. However, the court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s force majeure claim related to reclassification by German Customs, remitting the case for reconsideration by the First Appellate Committee to provide a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present evidence supporting their claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>