<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 737 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126225</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded six appeals to the Tribunal regarding the confiscation of foreign gold biscuits and penalties imposed on nine individuals. Despite procedural lapses and lack of representation by the appellants, the Tribunal found its order final and declined the need for a fresh order, as the Supreme Court&#039;s remand had been effectively implemented. The Tribunal emphasized that no adverse effects were caused by the department&#039;s appeal against its decision, ensuring resolution without further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 737 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126225</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded six appeals to the Tribunal regarding the confiscation of foreign gold biscuits and penalties imposed on nine individuals. Despite procedural lapses and lack of representation by the appellants, the Tribunal found its order final and declined the need for a fresh order, as the Supreme Court&#039;s remand had been effectively implemented. The Tribunal emphasized that no adverse effects were caused by the department&#039;s appeal against its decision, ensuring resolution without further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>