<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 677 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of central excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant company under relevant provisions. The waiver of pre-deposits was denied due to lack of establishing a prima facie case for relief, despite arguments of natural justice and financial hardship. Exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 was rejected as relevant turnover information was withheld. Clandestine removal of finished goods was proven, justifying the imposed demand and penalty. Directors were held liable for penalties, necessitating specified deposits. Stay was granted subject to full payment within a set timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 677 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of central excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant company under relevant provisions. The waiver of pre-deposits was denied due to lack of establishing a prima facie case for relief, despite arguments of natural justice and financial hardship. Exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 was rejected as relevant turnover information was withheld. Clandestine removal of finished goods was proven, justifying the imposed demand and penalty. Directors were held liable for penalties, necessitating specified deposits. Stay was granted subject to full payment within a set timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>