<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 658 -  BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126174</link>
    <description>A writ court should not interfere at the show cause notice stage unless there is a clear and patent absence of jurisdiction. Here, the customs notice alleged misuse of a duty exemption and breach of import conditions under the customs notification, which disclosed a prima facie customs issue for the issuing authority to examine first. The petitioners&#039; reliance on the aviation permit regime did not establish an absolute want of customs jurisdiction, particularly as they had already replied to the notice and had earlier withdrawn a related writ petition. The challenge to the notice was therefore rejected and extraordinary jurisdiction was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 658 -  BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126174</link>
      <description>A writ court should not interfere at the show cause notice stage unless there is a clear and patent absence of jurisdiction. Here, the customs notice alleged misuse of a duty exemption and breach of import conditions under the customs notification, which disclosed a prima facie customs issue for the issuing authority to examine first. The petitioners&#039; reliance on the aviation permit regime did not establish an absolute want of customs jurisdiction, particularly as they had already replied to the notice and had earlier withdrawn a related writ petition. The challenge to the notice was therefore rejected and extraordinary jurisdiction was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>