<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 652 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126168</link>
    <description>Declared import value for mixed stock lot goods cannot be rejected merely by comparing them with PVC granules or other non-comparable materials. The Department must prove undervaluation with reliable evidence and follow a legally permissible valuation method under the Customs Valuation Rules; contemporaneous import evidence, comparable clearances, and the importer&#039;s past assessments must be meaningfully considered. In the absence of reasoned findings and acceptable expert support, enhancement of value, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty are not sustainable. The text states that the impugned valuation order and consequential penalties were annulled and release of the goods on payment of duty on the declared value was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 652 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126168</link>
      <description>Declared import value for mixed stock lot goods cannot be rejected merely by comparing them with PVC granules or other non-comparable materials. The Department must prove undervaluation with reliable evidence and follow a legally permissible valuation method under the Customs Valuation Rules; contemporaneous import evidence, comparable clearances, and the importer&#039;s past assessments must be meaningfully considered. In the absence of reasoned findings and acceptable expert support, enhancement of value, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty are not sustainable. The text states that the impugned valuation order and consequential penalties were annulled and release of the goods on payment of duty on the declared value was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>