<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 650 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for Condonation of Delay, stay petitions, and appeals against the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva&#039;s order due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the claimed personal family problems causing the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a valid explanation for condonation of delay, finding the medical records provided did not establish the severity of the illness claimed. The decision was rendered on 22-4-2009 by Member (J) Ashok Jindal, represented by Shri A.K. Srivastava and Ashok Jindal, JJ.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 650 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for Condonation of Delay, stay petitions, and appeals against the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva&#039;s order due to insufficient medical evidence supporting the claimed personal family problems causing the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a valid explanation for condonation of delay, finding the medical records provided did not establish the severity of the illness claimed. The decision was rendered on 22-4-2009 by Member (J) Ashok Jindal, represented by Shri A.K. Srivastava and Ashok Jindal, JJ.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>