<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 649 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126165</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for default due to the appellant&#039;s absence, despite a prior dismissal and restoration with conditions. The Tribunal rejected the adjournment request based on the advocate&#039;s unavailability for pre-scheduled assignments abroad, emphasizing the need for proper representation arrangements. Non-compliance with restoration conditions and a lack of evidence of meeting requirements led to the dismissal. The judgment highlights the importance of procedural adherence, advocate diligence, and the repercussions of failing to comply with restoration conditions in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 649 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126165</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for default due to the appellant&#039;s absence, despite a prior dismissal and restoration with conditions. The Tribunal rejected the adjournment request based on the advocate&#039;s unavailability for pre-scheduled assignments abroad, emphasizing the need for proper representation arrangements. Non-compliance with restoration conditions and a lack of evidence of meeting requirements led to the dismissal. The judgment highlights the importance of procedural adherence, advocate diligence, and the repercussions of failing to comply with restoration conditions in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>