<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 639 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126155</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging the classification of Water proofed canvas cloth and Tarpaulin under heading 52.07. The Tribunal upheld the classification based on previous orders and found no valid grounds to dispute the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The appeal was rejected, affirming the classification of the goods under heading 52.07.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 639 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126155</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging the classification of Water proofed canvas cloth and Tarpaulin under heading 52.07. The Tribunal upheld the classification based on previous orders and found no valid grounds to dispute the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The appeal was rejected, affirming the classification of the goods under heading 52.07.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>