<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 622 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal resolved issues regarding the authorization of the authorized signatory, verification process, and continuation of the stay order. The appellant&#039;s counsel undertook to file the necessary authorization, addressing doubts raised by Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the stay order until appeal disposal, emphasizing compliance with filing the authorization for the stay order&#039;s continuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:04:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 622 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal resolved issues regarding the authorization of the authorized signatory, verification process, and continuation of the stay order. The appellant&#039;s counsel undertook to file the necessary authorization, addressing doubts raised by Revenue. The Tribunal upheld the stay order until appeal disposal, emphasizing compliance with filing the authorization for the stay order&#039;s continuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>