https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126132 Restoration of an appeal after remand was treated as arising from a fresh adjudication, because the subsequent order determined different amounts and generated a new cause of action. On that footing, clearance from the Committee on Disputes remained necessary in a dispute between a Central Ministry and a public sector undertaking. As such clearance was not shown, the restoration application was held not maintainable and was rejected. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:47:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126132 Restoration of an appeal after remand was treated as arising from a fresh adjudication, because the subsequent order determined different amounts and generated a new cause of action. On that footing, clearance from the Committee on Disputes remained necessary in a dispute between a Central Ministry and a public sector undertaking. As such clearance was not shown, the restoration application was held not maintainable and was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126132