https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126120 The Tribunal held that a communication dated 23-2-06 by the Assistant Commissioner did not qualify as an order under Section 129A of the Customs Act, as it lacked finality and adjudication by the Commissioner. The appeal by the Department was deemed not maintainable, and the cross objections were withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the cross objections were allowed to be withdrawn, resulting in the disposal of both. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:10:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126120 The Tribunal held that a communication dated 23-2-06 by the Assistant Commissioner did not qualify as an order under Section 129A of the Customs Act, as it lacked finality and adjudication by the Commissioner. The appeal by the Department was deemed not maintainable, and the cross objections were withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the cross objections were allowed to be withdrawn, resulting in the disposal of both. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126120