<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 787 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126111</link>
    <description>A job worker who filed price declarations on the basis of declarations and grey bills supplied by merchant-manufacturers was not shown to have knowledge of, or participation in, the undervaluation. On that factual basis, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked against the job worker, so the differential duty demand was time-barred beyond the normal period. Because the demand itself failed on limitation, the consequential penalties on the company and its director had no independent basis and could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 787 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126111</link>
      <description>A job worker who filed price declarations on the basis of declarations and grey bills supplied by merchant-manufacturers was not shown to have knowledge of, or participation in, the undervaluation. On that factual basis, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked against the job worker, so the differential duty demand was time-barred beyond the normal period. Because the demand itself failed on limitation, the consequential penalties on the company and its director had no independent basis and could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>