<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 784 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126107</link>
    <description>The Appeal was disposed of with the waiver of predeposit of penalty granted due to the Appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The confiscation of the truck used for smuggling goods was upheld, along with the redemption fine, but the personal penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 was set aside as the Appellant was found to have no connection to the smuggled goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 784 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126107</link>
      <description>The Appeal was disposed of with the waiver of predeposit of penalty granted due to the Appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The confiscation of the truck used for smuggling goods was upheld, along with the redemption fine, but the personal penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 was set aside as the Appellant was found to have no connection to the smuggled goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>