<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 761 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126084</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by Revenue regarding the clearance of empty drums/barrels without payment of Central Excise duty was dismissed. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, allowing the manufacturers to clear the empty drums/barrels without paying duty. The Supreme Court clarified that no duty could be demanded on containers used for packing inputs when cleared from the factory, based on previous rulings and clarifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:09:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 761 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126084</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by Revenue regarding the clearance of empty drums/barrels without payment of Central Excise duty was dismissed. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, allowing the manufacturers to clear the empty drums/barrels without paying duty. The Supreme Court clarified that no duty could be demanded on containers used for packing inputs when cleared from the factory, based on previous rulings and clarifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>