<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126073</link>
    <description>Exemption under notifications for goods used in specified public projects was treated as available where the intended end use was not disputed and the certificates bore the competent district authority&#039;s countersignature. Procedural objections, including the form of the certificate and the absence of the assessee&#039;s name in the document, were regarded as technical lapses rather than grounds to deny the exemption. On that basis, a prima facie case was found against the duty demand and penalties, supporting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126073</link>
      <description>Exemption under notifications for goods used in specified public projects was treated as available where the intended end use was not disputed and the certificates bore the competent district authority&#039;s countersignature. Procedural objections, including the form of the certificate and the absence of the assessee&#039;s name in the document, were regarded as technical lapses rather than grounds to deny the exemption. On that basis, a prima facie case was found against the duty demand and penalties, supporting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>