<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 733 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s collection of Customs duty, indicating a short recovery of duty in certain instances. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for further examination, including verification of data and reconsideration of the duty demand for the subsequent period. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case during the fresh proceedings. The case was remanded for a fresh decision with the appellants allowed to present their case again.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 733 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s collection of Customs duty, indicating a short recovery of duty in certain instances. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for further examination, including verification of data and reconsideration of the duty demand for the subsequent period. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case during the fresh proceedings. The case was remanded for a fresh decision with the appellants allowed to present their case again.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>