<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 668 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126052</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery were treated as eligible for Cenvat credit because binding High Court authority had already recognised such use as qualifying both as capital goods and as inputs. The contrary Tribunal view, which was supported only by summary dismissal of an SLP, was not accepted as laying down any law. On that basis, the disallowance of credit on welding electrodes was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 668 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126052</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery were treated as eligible for Cenvat credit because binding High Court authority had already recognised such use as qualifying both as capital goods and as inputs. The contrary Tribunal view, which was supported only by summary dismissal of an SLP, was not accepted as laying down any law. On that basis, the disallowance of credit on welding electrodes was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>