https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126026 The appellant's appeal was dismissed as they could not revert to duty based on actual production after opting for the compounded levy scheme. The Tribunal found no duty confirmed and the order challenged concerned the Annual Capacity of Production (ACP), which was left open by the Commissioner. Both parties agreed the appeal should be dismissed as infructuous. The Revenue's preliminary objection on limitation was rejected, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, following which the ROM application and appeal were disposed of. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:26:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126026 The appellant's appeal was dismissed as they could not revert to duty based on actual production after opting for the compounded levy scheme. The Tribunal found no duty confirmed and the order challenged concerned the Annual Capacity of Production (ACP), which was left open by the Commissioner. Both parties agreed the appeal should be dismissed as infructuous. The Revenue's preliminary objection on limitation was rejected, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, following which the ROM application and appeal were disposed of. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126026